Contents of The Legal Duties of Coaching
1. Duty to Provide Proper Supervision
2. Duty to Provide Proper Instruction
3. Duty to Enforce Rules and Regulations
4. Duty to Warn
5. Duty to Transport
6. Duty to Match Competitors
7. Duty to Provide Safe Equipment and Facilities
8. Duty to Provide Health Care
9. Duty to Protect Student Rights
1. Duty to Plan
2. Duty to Keep Records
3. Duty to Foresee
Part
A: General Legal Aspects
Negligence:
Failing to anticipate and eliminate an unreasonable risk of
injury.
Failing to exercise a reasonable amount of care in a situation that causes harm
to someone.
3 Types of Negligence
Duty:
A duty exists on the coach to take reasonable care of the student. This duty is a standard of care or standard of behavior that a coach must be able to perform as a professional.
Liable:
Being held responsible and accountable.
5 Elements of Negligence
5 Common Defenses Against
Negligence
Þ An honest blunder or a mistaken belief that no harm will result may absolve the actor from moral blame, but not from liability.
Þ Coaches CAN be held personally liable for injuries occurred in sport related activities.
Part
B: The Nine Legal Duties of Coaching:
1. Duty to Provide Proper Supervision
* As a coach, you must exercise reasonable care for the safe conduct of the athletes under your supervision.
* Lack of supervision is the most common form of sport negligence (80%).
* Lack of supervision does not automatically constitute liability.
- it must be shown that the lack of supervision was the proximate cause of injury.
- there must have been a duty to supervise.
Does The Duty To Supervise Exist?
A. Assume no duty: Not applicable to coaches during any mandatory activity.
B. Danger not foreseeable
C. Activity does not need supervising
D. Nature of activity in relation to age:
· 1-7 - cannot assume any risk
· 8-12 - assume some risk
· 13-16- assume most risk
· 17 -can assume risk
· except handicapped
i. Mental
ii. Physical
iii. Emotional
A. if you state or imply that there will be supervision, then you become legally obligated.
A. Being a coach means you must provide the highest level of care.
2 Types Of Supervision
A. group behavior
B. Facilities and equipment
A. Instruction of new and complex skills
B. Participant incapability
C. Unique participant behavior
· Anger
· Frustration
· Aggression
· Fatigue
· likelihood to hurt self and others
Qualities Of A Supervisor
A Supervisor Must Know
What A Supervisor Needs To Be
Able To Do
3 Keys To Supervision
A. Danger of the activity
B. Skill level
C. Maturity
D. Stay close enough to supervise, but don’t get in the way.
A. when is aggressive to aggressive? when is fatigued, exhausted?
B. when does horse play become malicious?
C. Establish a clear STOP signal.
4 General Rules For
Supervision
In The Event Of A Lawsuit Due
To Lack Of Supervision, Courts Look At:
Sample Court Case:
Marcantel v.
A 12 year-old boy broke his leg while playing a game of playground football. The injury occurred when he was tackled and landed upon by another boy. While this was happening, the teacher was leaving for a conference and was to be replaced by an aid. The parents of the boy sued and won on the grounds of lack of supervision.
2. Duty To Properly Instruct
* This duty implies that it is paramount that the coach use the latest methods of proper instruction, using sound progression in learning motor skills. If an injury occurs while using an improper instructional technique, negligence will most likely be proven.
Proper Instruction
Points Of Emphasis
3 General Areas Of Proper
Instruction
Remember:
Sample Court Case:
Chris Thompson v.
After catching a pass in a football game, Chris Thompson ran toward the sidelines and lowered his head to run through a tackler. As a consequence of running through the tackler, Thompson severed his spinal cord and instantly became a quadriplegic. Thompson sued the school district because he was never taught not to lower his head when making contact. Thompson won this case and was awarded 6.4 million dollars on the grounds of failure to properly instruct.
3. Duty To Teach And Enforce Rules And
Regulations
* This duty applies to three aspects 1) Teaching and enforcing rules and regulations of the game. 2) Teaching and enforcing safety aspects. 3) Enforcing and upholding district policies and procedures.
A. Clear distribution and explanation of rules and regulations.
B. Clear explanation of game protocol (ex. Left fielder calls off shortstop in softball)
C. Clear description and explanation of the consequences that may occur with infraction
· safety consequences
· punishment consequences
D. Consistent enforcement of rules and regulations
A. Clear description and explanation of program safety guidelines
B. Clear description and explanation of infraction consequences
· safety
· punishment
C. Consistently enforce
A. Determine eligibility
B. Keep accurate rosters
C. Collect physical exam documents
D. Collect health insurance documents
E. Issue student/parent handbook
F. Make self, staff, students and parents aware of school and districts policies
G. Issue warning statements
H. Make all aware of new playing rules
I. Follow through with post-season responsibilities
Þ Rules that are not enforced are not rules at all
Sample Court Case:
An administrator responsible for a high school athletic program failed to comply with rules and regulations by allowing an individual to compete without a physical or parent permission slip. The student died of a heart attack while playing football.
4. Duty to Warn of the Dangers in a
Sport
* It is the responsibility of every coach to inform all athletes and their parents of the inherent risks involved in a particular sport. Coaches must describe, using a variety of methods, the catastrophic and common non-catastrophic injuries in a sport.
Þ A person cannot accept a risk they are not aware of.
A warning is communication:
Warning must provide:
Warnings must change with
changing:
Warning should include:
Sample Court Case
Lamphear v. State
An intercollegiate softball game was played on a makeshift field. A player was injured when she hit a large hole while sliding into third base. The player sued and was awarded $18,000. The court stated that since the player was playing normally and had no knowledge of the hole the state was negligent.
Waivers
Þ Voluntary giving up of a right
Þ Does not remove liability from willful and wanton misconduct
Þ “...at your own risk.” is a worthless statement
Þ A waiver signed by a minor is not a valid document.
Þ Parents cannot sign away a child’s right to sue.
An Effective Waiver Must:
Components of a warning
wavier sheet should include:
Informed consent must
include:
8 factors that will void a
waiver:
The real problem with waivers
So why have waivers at all:
Sample Court Case:
Macek v. Schooner’s Inc. 3991
A man had his arm broken while competing with an arm wrestling machine at a local tavern. The man had signed a release waiving damages “for any and all injuries suffered.” The court found the document to contain ambiguous language and thus, found the tavern liable for the injury.
5. Duty To Provide Safe Transportation
* Coaches have a legal duty to see that all athletes are safely transported to and from contests and to and from practices if they are held at sites other than the immediate school grounds.
Methods of Transportation
If you must send athlete with
a non staff member
Ø
Follow
District Policy
Guest Statute
A guest is one whom the operator of a motor vehicle invites to ride without financial or other compensation and where the relationship does not provide for tangible benefit for the driver.
Sample Court Case
Vechel v.
Twelve high school cheerleaders prepared banners for the
next day’s football game. The banners were to be delivered to the homes of the
football players. One of the cheerleaders borrowed her parent’s van and the
cheerleaders proceeded to distribute the banners at
6. Duty to Properly Match and Evaluate
Competitors
* As a coach, it is your duty to accurately group participants for activity in a manner in which they may participate safely. It is also your duty to place an athlete into a situation which they have progressed enough to handle. Along with these duties, it is also your responsibility to observe any incapacitating conditions such as exhaustion or fatigue and deal with these conditions appropriately.
Factors for matching
competitors:
v Coaches should never scrimmage against their own players!
v Matching is not only player to player, but also player with activity.
Sample Court Case:
Benitez v.
The principal of a
7. Duty to Provide Safe Facilities and
Equipment
* This duty has been neglected considerably in the past. Some sport facilities are rather old and many athletic events are practiced, and games played on, or in, inadequate facilities. Inferior equipment has been used without proper maintenance or repair. It is important to remember that the coach is always responsible for the situation in which they place their athletes.
Þ Invitee –
a. goes on to the premise by the specific or implied invitation of the owner
b. requires the highest standard of care
Þ Licensee-
a. came onto the premises for personal benefit, but owner gave consent
b. lower standard of care (reasonable conditions/warn of risks)
Þ Trespasser-
a. no permission to access facility
b. no duty of care unless to a minor
Potential for injuries in
facilities
To improve facility safety
Keys to keeping the
environment safe
Equipment
Equipment: General Prevention
Specific equipment needs
3 types of legal equipment
standards
4 main reasons people get
injured using snorts equipment
Warnings on equipment must
Question: If I report and document a request for a facility repair am I safe from liability? Answer. No. You as the coach are responsible for the environment in which you place your athletes.
Question: Then what if the
administration will not or can not fix the problem?
Answer:
Common fault checklist
Þ
Never
hand down any used safety equipment
Sample Court Case (Equipment)
Ausmus v. Board of Education
A third grade child was hit in the face with a bat while playing catcher during a softball game in a PE class. The parents sued the school on the grounds that proper equipment was not used. The bat was too heavy for kids of that age and no mask was provided for the catcher. The parents won this case on the grounds that proper equipment was not provided.
Sample Court Case (facility)
McInnis v. Town of
A seventh grade boy suffered a sprained ankle while attempting a long jump in a PE class. The boy was taught proper technique, but the landing pit was filled with only 2 inches of sawdust, rather than the usual 6 to 12 inches. The boy sued for negligence and was awarded $60,000.
8. Duty to Provide Health Care
There are three areas of proper heath care 1. Before an athletic event, 2. During an athletic event, and 3. After an athletic event or injury.
Before
During - Emergency Health Care
1. Duties in an emergency
A. Protect from further harm
B. Must attempt to help in life threatening situations
C. Provide comfort and reassure victim
D. Put emergency plan into action
2. Essential components of an emergency plan
A. Send for help (know where a phone is)
B. Protect from further harm
C. Attempt to help
D. Comfort and reassure victim
E. Collect and keep records
· Document witnesses
· save statements
· take photos
· save game films
After
The athletic department is responsible to fully rehabilitate injured athletes when they are injured in school sponsored athletic events.
Sample court case
Mogab v.
Shortly before the end of practice, a football player became noxious, vomited and was unable to walk without assistance. Following the coaches instructions, a few players undressed the boy and gave him a room temperature shower and then laid him on a blanket in the cafeteria. The coaches then massaged his arms and tried to force him to drink some salt water. While this was going on, the boy was extremely pale and unable to talk, The boy’s condition grew worse to the point where his mouth hung open and his skin turned a bluish gray.
The coaches still did not call a doctor, but did finally call the boy’s mother. The boy’s mother called a doctor who didn’t arrive until two hours after the boy had collapsed. The boy was taken to a hospital were he died in a matter of hours.
The boy’s parents sued and won on the grounds of failure to provide proper health care.
9. Duty to Uphold Student Rights
• The key to upholding student rights is to act reasonably. Participation in extracurricular athletics is seen by the courts as a privilege, not a constitutional right. Therefore, any reasonable team rules and punishment will hold up in court. However, it is important to remember that reasonable is a very subjective term. Because the term is so subjective, you must remember that the more severe the punishment, the more imperative it becomes to document due process. For example, if you make an athlete miss a game because he or she skipped practice there will be no problems. On the other hand, if you make that same athlete ineligible for the remainder of their high school career, then you most likely will have some problems.
Þ 1st amendment - Religion-Speech - A public school coach may not lead the team in prayer, but may provide a moment of silence.
Þ 14th Amendment Due Process - The more severe the penalty, the more process is due
Þ Title IX - There may be no sexual discrimination in any form in any program receiving federal or state money.
Þ Disabilities Act -You must provide an opportunity for any and all students to turn out for a team. A coach may not cut an athlete solely due to a disability nor must the coach keep an athlete because they are disabled.
Þ Drug Testing - Must have
1. Compelling need
2. Limited Scope (few tested)
3. Diminished expectation of privacy(surrender privacy in order to participate)
4. Limitations on official’s discretion (clear criteria for those tested)
5. Non-criminal penalties (results can only be used for non criminal, educational or rehabilitative penalties)
Þ Search and seizure - Search must be reasonable and substantiated
v
Participation
in athletics is not a constitutional right
Sample Court Case:
Bailey v. Truby
A school board required that all student/athletes maintain a 2.0 gpa and they not receive any “F” grades. A student sued the school board, stating that the school board was unreasonable and superseded the state rules and requirements. The court ruled that the standards were reasonable and within the power of the school board. The court also stated that extracurricular activities are not constitutionally guaranteed so the educational and substantive due process was not violated.
Part C: 3 Duties Within Each Duty
1. The Duty to Plan
Lack of planning is a major cause of coaches being derelict in their instruction and supervision. Careful planning is involved in good instruction while safe supervision is based on good planning.
Important Considerations in
Planning
A. get plan approved
B. if you deviate from plan, get it approved
C. use clear language
D. issue to staff
A plan should
Risk Management Plan
(outline)
A. Identify all risks (equipment, movement, facility, other)
B. Determine extent (frequency/severity)
C. Control methods (preventative)
Þ
Develop
and use checklists
Þ
Ask
yourself “what if ?“
2. Duty to keep records
• Today, with our courts backed up a
great deal with case loads, there can be a delay from
Suggested items to save
Þ
Build a
paper trail
Sample Court Case:
Although no court cases have been decided solely on a lack of keeping records, record keeping is listed as a duty because the coach must prove that he/she acted properly. The coach is not innocent until proven guilty, but rather guilty until proven innocent. It is the coaches’ responsibility to prove the child was given proper care.
3 The duty to Foresee
Þ
Negligence
is failing to anticipate and eliminate unreasonable risk of injury
Sample Court Case:
Benjerman v. State 1982
An eleven year old boy was struck in the head by a hockey puck while standing behind the player’s bench at a college hockey game. The blow resulted in serious injury and required brain surgery. The boy’s parents sued for negligence citing that there was no protective glass behind the bench to protect fans from such an incident. The court found a “foreseeable risk of injury that could have and should have been avoided” and found in favor of the boy.